TL;DR
Listen free for 30 days with Audible
Thousands of audiobooks and originals — cancel anytime.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The FCC has approved spectrum acquisitions by AT&T and Starlink, drawing criticism from small rural carriers who argue the moves harm competition and rural service. The approvals are part of ongoing spectrum consolidation efforts.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has approved spectrum sales involving AT&T and Starlink, a move that has angered small rural carriers and raised concerns over market competition. The approvals, announced by FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel, are part of broader spectrum consolidation efforts that critics say could harm rural wireless services and competition in the industry.
The FCC approved AT&T’s purchase of EchoStar’s spectrum licenses, including mid-band and low-band frequencies, which AT&T plans to deploy to enhance its network capacity. The agency also approved a deal allowing Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet service, to acquire spectrum licenses aimed at developing Direct-to-Device (D2D) services using low Earth orbit satellites. These approvals come despite opposition from the Rural Wireless Association (RWA), which argues that the deals will reduce spectrum access for small and rural wireless providers, further consolidating market power among the three major carriers—AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.
The FCC’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau approved the EchoStar sale, with FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel attributing the decision to the policies of the previous administration under President Trump. Rosenworcel stated that the approvals will help bring faster internet speeds and more competition, including satellite-based connectivity directly to smartphones. AT&T has indicated it has already begun deploying the spectrum to boost network capacity and expects to complete the acquisition by mid-2026. Meanwhile, Starlink’s move into D2D spectrum aims to expand satellite-based services, though details about the specific spectrum licenses and their deployment timelines remain limited.
Why It Matters
This development matters because it reflects ongoing consolidation in the US wireless spectrum market, which critics argue could limit competition and harm rural connectivity. The Rural Wireless Association warns that these spectrum deals continue a pattern of aggregation that disadvantages small carriers and impedes efforts to extend wireless coverage to underserved rural areas. The approvals also highlight ongoing tensions between regulatory agencies and industry stakeholders over the balance between industry consolidation and competition policy.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Over the past few years, the FCC has increasingly approved large spectrum transactions involving major carriers, citing spectrum efficiency and network improvements. The recent approvals follow a pattern where the agency has prioritized facilitating the deployment of next-generation 5G and satellite services, often amid opposition from smaller wireless providers. The Rural Wireless Association has previously raised concerns about spectrum consolidation reducing opportunities for rural carriers, which are vital for expanding coverage in hard-to-serve areas. The current approvals come as the industry prepares for a new wave of satellite and terrestrial wireless services, with Starlink positioning itself as a key player in the emerging D2D market.
“Thanks to President Trump, America is leading the world again in next-gen technology. As a result of President Trump’s work, Americans are now going to see faster Internet speeds, stronger competition, and innovative new offerings, including high-speed connections right to your smartphone from space—providing ubiquitous connectivity when these new systems are complete.”
— Jessica Rosenworcel, FCC Chair
“The spectrum sales continue the troubling pattern of spectrum aggregation that disadvantages rural wireless providers, stifles competition in the wireless marketplace, and hinders the deployment of wireless services—particularly in the hardest-to-serve rural areas.”
— Rural Wireless Association (RWA)
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear how much spectrum, if any, will be allocated specifically to small carriers in future deals involving EchoStar, or if the FCC will revisit the approval amid ongoing industry and stakeholder opposition. Details about the specific impact on rural service expansion are still emerging, and the long-term effects of these spectrum consolidations are yet to be fully assessed.
What’s Next
Next steps include the completion of AT&T’s acquisition of EchoStar spectrum licenses, expected by mid-2026, and further regulatory reviews of Starlink’s D2D spectrum plans. Small carriers and industry advocates are likely to continue lobbying the FCC for increased spectrum access and to oppose further consolidations. The Rural Wireless Association has indicated it may pursue additional regulatory or legal avenues to challenge the approvals.
Key Questions
Why did the FCC approve these spectrum deals?
The FCC approved the deals citing the benefits of increased network capacity, faster internet speeds, and the promotion of next-generation connectivity, including satellite-based services, as stated by FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel.
How will this affect rural wireless providers?
Critics, including the Rural Wireless Association, argue that these approvals will reduce spectrum availability for small and rural providers, potentially hindering their ability to expand coverage and compete effectively.
What is Starlink’s role in this spectrum sale?
Starlink is seeking spectrum licenses to develop Direct-to-Device satellite services, which aim to provide mobile connectivity directly to smartphones using low Earth orbit satellites. Details about the deployment timeline remain limited.
Will small carriers have opportunities to acquire spectrum in future deals?
The Rural Wireless Association suggests there may still be opportunities for small carriers to obtain spectrum licenses from EchoStar in future transactions, but specifics are unclear.
What might happen if opposition to these deals grows?
Further regulatory reviews or legal challenges could be pursued by industry stakeholders or advocacy groups if opposition to the spectrum consolidations intensifies, potentially affecting the final implementation of these deals.
Fall yard work Picks
leaf blowers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
