🔍 Read the full analysis: Same Night, Opposite Verdicts: Why Investors Rewarded Microsoft And Punished Alphabet on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Microsoft shares gained about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading on Wednesday, October 28, after both companies reported results. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster, but the companies’ cash-flow positions and earnings results diverged: Microsoft reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow and beat expectations, while Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion and missed key forecasts.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% while Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading Wednesday, after both companies reported earnings and cloud growth. Alphabet’s Google Cloud revenue grew faster than Microsoft’s Azure, but Microsoft beat analyst forecasts and generated $18.6 billion in free cash flow; Alphabet reported negative $9.1 billion and missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, according to the companies’ results and coverage cited by ThorstenMeyerAI.com.
Microsoft reported Azure revenue of $33.2 billion, up 48%, while Alphabet said Google Cloud revenue reached $30.7 billion, up 103%. Those growth rates cover the companies’ respective reported cloud businesses, and Google Cloud’s was more than twice Azure’s. Microsoft disclosed Azure’s quarterly revenue in dollars for the first time, according to the source report.
The earnings picture differed beyond cloud. Microsoft reported quarterly revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19%, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, above the $4.73 analysts polled by LSEG expected. Azure growth also exceeded Microsoft’s July forecast of 45%. Alphabet, by contrast, missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, the report said, citing CNBC. The source described it as Alphabet’s first simultaneous revenue and profit miss in nearly four years.
Cash generation was another divide. Microsoft recorded $18.6 billion in free cash flow, while Alphabet reported a second consecutive negative quarter at minus $9.1 billion. The source report said Alphabet raised $28.7 billion through bonds and $12.4 billion by issuing shares during the quarter, and did not buy back shares. It attributed the different share-price reactions partly to investors’ assessment of how companies are financing their AI infrastructure build-outs.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shapes the AI Trade
The results show why investors may look beyond headline cloud growth when judging the cost and durability of the AI boom. Revenue growth does not itself pay for data centers, chips and networking equipment; companies also need cash or access to outside financing. Microsoft’s positive free cash flow offered evidence that it could fund at least part of its investment from operations. Alphabet’s negative figure, alongside its bond and share issuance, highlighted a greater reliance on external capital during this quarter.
That distinction is a market interpretation, not proof that one company’s AI strategy will succeed and the other’s will fail. After-hours share moves capture investors’ immediate reaction to results, forecasts and perceived risk. They do not settle the longer-term contest for AI customers. The figures do, however, make funding needs part of the near-term investment debate, alongside the pace at which cloud revenue is growing.
Capacity constraints complicate the comparison. Both companies said demand exceeds available supply, meaning spending plans and customer commitments may not translate into revenue on the schedule investors expect. Orders and backlogs are commitments, not cash receipts, and delayed infrastructure deliveries can affect both spending and the ability to serve customers.
Products Worth Considering
LG 34GX90SA-W 34-inch Ultragear WQHD OLED Curved Gaming Monitor
EcoFlow Smart Home Panel 2 Whole-Home Backup System Hub
Apple iPad Air (2025) 13‑inch Wi‑Fi 256 GB – Space Gray (M3 chip)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Cloud Growth Meets Build-Out Costs
The comparison rests on four measures identified in the source report: capital-spending plans, cloud growth relative to investment, free cash flow and infrastructure capacity. Neither company increased its stated 2026 capital-spending plan, according to the report, but both pointed to higher spending in 2027. Microsoft’s plan was about $170 billion for 2026, compared with about $175 billion previously; Alphabet’s was $195 billion to $205 billion, unchanged, with a substantial increase expected in 2027.
Reported spending measures need careful comparison. Microsoft said capital spending including finance leases was $45.2 billion; cash paid for property and equipment was $39.4 billion, compared with $19.4 billion a year earlier. The source said Alphabet’s capital spending was up 114% from a year earlier, based on its arithmetic from cash-flow statements. These figures describe different reported or calculated measures and should not be treated as interchangeable.
Microsoft’s commercial remaining performance obligation, or contracted revenue not yet recognized, rose 73% to $677 billion. About 30% was expected to turn into revenue within 12 months, and the average duration was 2.3 years, according to the source. Google Cloud’s comparable customer commitments were reported at $561 billion. Neither backlog figure represents revenue already collected.
“Access additional sources of funding when we believe it is attractive.”
— Amy Hood, on Microsoft’s earnings call, as quoted by ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Capacity and Cash Needs Ahead
The results do not establish how quickly either company can turn its customer commitments into recognized revenue. Microsoft said only about 30% of its $677 billion commercial backlog was due to convert within 12 months; the timing and eventual realization of the remainder are not guaranteed by the figure itself. Comparable detail about the timing of Google Cloud’s reported $561 billion in commitments is not provided in the source material.
Infrastructure availability is also unsettled. Microsoft’s delayed GPU deliveries are expected to push into the first half of 2027, while the source report said Google had begun renting capacity from third parties. The amount of capacity each company can secure, and how quickly it can serve demand, remains unclear. Alphabet’s negative free cash flow and financing activity describe this quarter; they do not by themselves show whether its cash position will persist or what future financing it may pursue.
The source material also leaves open how much of Microsoft’s cash-flow result reflected delayed spending. If planned deliveries arrive later, spending may rise in subsequent quarters. It is not yet clear whether the market’s contrasting reactions will hold as those costs and customer demand become more visible.
Next Quarter Tests Spending Plans
Investors will look to the companies’ next earnings reports for evidence that planned infrastructure spending is being delivered and that cloud growth is converting into cash. Microsoft’s CFO, Amy Hood, said the company expected capital spending to exceed $50 billion in the current quarter and accelerate in the first half of 2027, according to the source. That forecast will help show whether the previous quarter’s delayed deliveries shifted costs into later periods.
Further updates on GPU availability, third-party capacity, capital spending and free cash flow will clarify how each company is financing its AI expansion. Alphabet’s next results will also show whether its cash-flow performance and search advertising recover from the reported quarter’s levels. Until then, the contrast is clear for this earnings release, but the longer-term outcome remains unsettled.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
According to the source report, Microsoft beat analyst expectations for revenue and earnings and reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising and reported negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow. Those differences may help explain the opposing after-hours moves, though share prices reflect investors’ expectations and not a definitive judgment on long-term performance.
Which company had faster cloud growth?
Google Cloud grew faster by the reported revenue rates: Alphabet reported 103% growth to $30.7 billion, compared with Azure growth of 48% to $33.2 billion at Microsoft.
What does negative free cash flow mean here?
It means Alphabet’s cash outflows exceeded the cash it generated after the relevant investments in the quarter, as presented in the source report. The report also said Alphabet raised money through bond sales and new shares; the quarterly figure alone does not establish what its future cash flow will be.
Are the cloud backlogs the same as cash or current revenue?
No. The reported $677 billion for Microsoft and $561 billion for Google Cloud refer to customer commitments or remaining performance obligations, not cash already collected. The timing of when those commitments become recognized revenue can vary.
What will investors watch next?
Key items include whether Microsoft’s delayed capacity arrives, whether its spending exceeds $50 billion in the current quarter as forecast by Hood, and how both companies’ cloud growth and free cash flow develop. Updates on Alphabet’s financing and advertising business will also matter.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
